A pardon is a form of legal forgiveness that can provide significant relief for individuals convicted of crimes in Oklahoma. While a pardon does not erase the conviction from the record, it restores crucial civil rights, such as the ability to vote, hold public office, or serve on a jury. In Oklahoma’s legal system, pardons offer a path to rehabilitation and reintegration, but it’s essential to understand that receiving a pardon is a privilege, not a right. Pardons are granted at the discretion of the Governor, following a recommendation from the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board. This process is complex, making the assistance of an experienced [Oklahoma pardon attorney](https://www.postconviction.lawyer/oklahoma-pardon-attorney/) essential for those seeking to improve their chances of success.
Services
Daniel Smith
Daniel Smith 
In Oklahoma, a pardon is a significant form of legal forgiveness that does not erase a criminal conviction but restores civil rights like voting and holding public office. The process, though complex, opens up opportunities previously unavailable due to the conviction. At the Oklahoma Post-Conviction Law Firm, our specialized pardon attorneys guide you through every step, enhancing your chance for a successful outcome. If you’re considering this post-conviction relief, it’s crucial to understand the process, requirements, and how an experienced attorney can provide invaluable assistance. Start your journey toward regaining your rights and improving your life quality with professional legal support.
Daniel Smith
Post-conviction relief is a critical process for those seeking to challenge errors in their trial or sentencing. Governed by the Uniform Post-Conviction Procedure Act in Oklahoma, it allows for a case review based on new evidence or legal discrepancies. Key to this process is the involvement of a specialized attorney who can navigate the complex legal terrain and advocate effectively for a new trial, sentence reduction, or overturned conviction. If you believe there were mistakes in your initial trial or have discovered new evidence, understanding the eligibility and timeframe for filing a petition is crucial. Consult an experienced Oklahoma post-conviction relief attorney to explore your legal options and potentially overturn an unjust conviction.
Daniel Smith
For individuals who believe they were wrongfully convicted or sentenced, post-conviction relief offers a crucial legal avenue to seek justice. In Oklahoma, this process allows those who have exhausted their direct appeals to request a review of their conviction or sentence. Whether it’s due to new evidence or legal errors during the trial, post-conviction relief can provide a second chance to challenge the outcome of a case. However, navigating the complexities of this legal process requires the guidance of a skilled [Oklahoma post-conviction relief attorney](https://www.postconviction.lawyer/), who can help ensure your rights are fully protected.
Daniel Smith
Post-conviction relief in Oklahoma offers a vital avenue for those who feel wrongly convicted or unfairly sentenced. This process allows for the reevaluation of cases where new evidence, legal errors, or constitutional breaches might overturn convictions or alter sentences. If you are navigating this complex landscape, consulting with a skilled Oklahoma post-conviction relief lawyer is crucial. They can guide you through each step, ensuring your rights are protected and advocating for your case effectively. Understanding your legal options and acting swiftly is essential in seeking justice and potentially altering the outcome of your case.
Aaron W. Easton. Esq. 
In this third installment of a five-part series, Oklahoma City Attorney Aaron Easton delves into the concept of ineffective assistance of counsel and its impact on a petitioner’s right to seek post-conviction relief. Easton explains that every citizen, including Oklahomans, is entitled to receive effective legal representation under the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. He then focuses on the first prong of the two-pronged test established by the Supreme Court case Strickland v. Washington. This prong requires proving that the defense attorney’s representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness. Easton emphasizes the importance of adhering to the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals’ interpretation and application of the state’s rules of professional conduct. If you believe you were convicted due to ineffective counsel, Easton recommends seeking a private consultation with an attorney to determine your eligibility for post-conviction relief.
Aaron W. Easton. Esq.
In this fourth part of a five-part series, Oklahoma City Attorney Aaron Easton delves into the second prong of Strickland’s test for post-conviction relief. After discussing the first prong in the previous video, Easton emphasizes the significance of meeting this initial requirement before moving on to the second prong. He explains that the petitioner must demonstrate not only the attorney’s deficient performance but also the resulting prejudice they experienced as a direct consequence. Drawing on the U.S. Supreme Court’s elucidation, Easton highlights the need to establish a clear link between the ineffective counsel and the detrimental impact on the outcome of the proceedings. Interested individuals can contact Easton’s firm for a initial consultation on their specific case.